More Good News From Iraq
Most Americans understand now that Iraq is a mess, has been a mess for years, and will probably be messy for years to come – on our dime, our watch, and with our lives in danger.
There are however some, “Iraq is going well,” or the “war is working” Bush supporters, who, albeit come in very small percentages, may be interested in reading the latest:
However, this isn’t even the best part. You’ll of course remember that the previous justification du jour regarding the invasion of Iraq was the link to 9/11, terrorism, and threats from radical Islam in Iraq (all of which still have yet to build their case for war).
It turns out that the one-time secular, Sunni Muslim dominated counterbalance to Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, Iran, and other radical Islamic players in the region, is now itself moving toward a more radicalized, Shiite-ized state, progressing from a secular dictatorship style government to a radically Islamic state:
The good news however, is that this report was issued by the United Nations, who along with college professors, the New York Times, and the entire city of San Francisco, is considered by the Right to be too irrelevant and full of hatred for America to amount to anything.
But for the rest of us not on planet Falwell keeping score at home…
Since the invasion of Iraq, you know, to combat global terrorism:
Global terrorism has increased threefold- Iran has started to develop nuclear weapons- Iran has also elected a hard-line radical Islamic president, who sympathizes with the former Ayatollah Khomeini
North Korea is conducting missile tests to see how close to California they can hurl their nuclear goodies
Iraq is heading toward civil war with unprecedented sectarian and religious violence, after electing a Shiite majority to its government, and re-writing its Constitution to move toward a more Islamic state
A recognized terrorist organization has won an election in Palestine to control its Parliament- Egypt’s parliamentary elections have further radicalized the nation via election of the Muslim Brotherhood to more representation
Iran is now encouraging and supporting Hezbollah as it attempts to start war with Israel
Without getting into body armor, back door drafts, mind-blowing spending, American casualties, missing money, alienating allies and forgetting about Afghanistan, I’d say we’re doing a heck of a job in Iraq.
There are however some, “Iraq is going well,” or the “war is working” Bush supporters, who, albeit come in very small percentages, may be interested in reading the latest:
More than 14,000 civilians have been killed in Iraq in the first half of this year, an ominous figure reflecting the fact that "killings, kidnappings and torture remain widespread" in the war-torn country, a United Nations report says.
Killings of civilians are on "an upward trend," with more than 5,800 deaths and more than 5,700 injuries reported in May and June alone, it says.
The report, a bimonthly document produced by the U.N. Assistance Mission for Iraq, covers May and June, and includes chilling casualty figures and ugly anecdotes from the insurgent and sectarian warfare that continues to rage despite the establishment of a national unity government and a security crackdown in Baghdad.
Read on...
However, this isn’t even the best part. You’ll of course remember that the previous justification du jour regarding the invasion of Iraq was the link to 9/11, terrorism, and threats from radical Islam in Iraq (all of which still have yet to build their case for war).
It turns out that the one-time secular, Sunni Muslim dominated counterbalance to Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, Iran, and other radical Islamic players in the region, is now itself moving toward a more radicalized, Shiite-ized state, progressing from a secular dictatorship style government to a radically Islamic state:
The U.N. agency says it has been made aware since last year of the targeting of
homosexuals, "increasingly threatened and extra-judicially executed by militias and 'death squads' because of their sexual orientation." The intolerance propelling the anti-gay prejudice extends to ethnic and religious minorities and others whose manner of dress doesn't meet the standards of religious extremists.
"On 28 May, an Iraqi tennis coach and two of his players were shot dead in Baghdad allegedly because they were wearing shorts. Similar threats are said to be made to induce men to conform to certain hair styles or rules regarding facial hair," the report says.Women face intolerance -- and violence -- as well.
"In some Baghdad neighborhoods, women are now prevented from going to the markets alone. In other cases, women have been warned not to drive cars or have faced harassment if they wear trousers. Women have also reported that wearing a headscarf is becoming not a matter of religious choice but one of survival in many parts of Iraq, a fact which is particularly resented by non-Muslim women."
The good news however, is that this report was issued by the United Nations, who along with college professors, the New York Times, and the entire city of San Francisco, is considered by the Right to be too irrelevant and full of hatred for America to amount to anything.
But for the rest of us not on planet Falwell keeping score at home…
Since the invasion of Iraq, you know, to combat global terrorism:
Without getting into body armor, back door drafts, mind-blowing spending, American casualties, missing money, alienating allies and forgetting about Afghanistan, I’d say we’re doing a heck of a job in Iraq.

14 Comments:
Yeah the Bush doctrine has been sooo successful.
now, jeremy, don't be a bush hater. he is so well liked in the rest of the world and is on such good terms that he can kick back with a beer(putin), yuk it up good ole boy style(blair), and he is especially popular with the ladies(merkel). what's a little arab bloodshed or black folks floating? he is just a fun guy.
I actually wanted to write about the Merkel incident...have you guys seen this video yet? That's perfect comedic materal. You couldn't make this shit up.
Iraq has been in civil war for cloes to a year now... It depends on the definition of civil war. The start of civil war IS civil war...
Planet Falwell! Ha! :>)
hmmm, Who would I listen too.........
Retired general says Iraq not in civil war
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 7/13/6 |
Despite worsening violence in Iraq, the war-torn nation has not erupted into civil war because most of the bloodshed is sectarian-generated in and around Baghdad, said retired Gen. Carl Stiner.
Stiner, a former four-star general in charge of the U.S. Special Operations Command who continues to work for the Pentagon, said Wednesday that much of the killing is Shiite against Sunni in a barrage of shootings, car bombs and suicide bombings all within the past few days.
"All of this has been concentrated in Baghdad, the seat of government. It is a mixture of Shiite and Sunni, with jihadists and criminals, which is a bad combination," Stiner said.
"But I do not think this is civil war. The new government is in charge. This is a complex situation with the extremists trying to make it as difficult as possible for the new government," he said.
The majority of Iraqis do not support what is going on now, Stiner added. "They want their freedom, and there are others who don't want them to have freedom and to see a democratic nation in that part of the world."
Stiner said he believes the Iraqi government is "making good progress in conjunction with the new Iraqi army."
"We are performing combined operations right now and the Iraqi army has some units now that are doing good work and able to defend themselves," he said.
American military advisers are with those units, Stiner said, and are working the operations with their Iraqi counterparts.
The insurgency, he said, continues to receive help from Syria and Iran, which allow passage through their borders into Iraq.
"The American people still have not come to understand that this is a long, complex war," he said. "It is unlike any war we have ever fought. If you look around the world, just (Tuesday) there were many people killed in India with the train explosions.
"This threat is not going to go away based on wishful thinking. We have got to hang in there with our allies who are helping us. This is a long war, and we need to understand that."
"Stiner, a former four-star general in charge of the U.S. Special Operations Command who continues to work for the Pentagon, said Wednesday... "
Weird - a Pentagon employee under the current Federal government umbrella, pushing to stay the course in Iraq. What are the chances?
Wierder------Someone regurgitating slanted, bias , vitriolic anthems on how evil, wrong, and demented our country is from the nice cozy living room of their million dollar house on the ocean. All the while telling a four star general with first hand experience how wrong he is, because he works for the Government ? So in order for an opinion to become valid for you, they must not work for , or see first hand experience of things that prove you wrong ? That only works for soldiers who agree with you ? Somethings kooky here buddy.
Sorry but I'll believe a Four star General, the leaders of the Iraqi and US armies over some Radical left wing blogger who wishes for our defeat in Iraq in order to get Democrats elected.
I'm actually writing from a rented apartment/house...$1200/month split between four people, overlooking my neighbor’s above ground pool. But, sometimes in the right lighting it looks like the ocean.
(It should be noted..Your comment is also an incredibly backwards Republican talking point that accuses liberals of having money and wealth versus conseratives of opposing view points. I would love to debate that fact with you and back it up with statistics - however you only need to look at the party fighting the hardest to repeal the Estate Tax, and Bush using that as a leverage point with the black community in front of the NAACP the other day.)
So, I'm radical because I have a problem with religion in government, believe in science, and know a few gay people and are therefore less afraid of them?
Do you think accusing someone of wanting their country to lose a war for political reasons is perhaps in and of itself radical, Anonymous? You don't think the very definition of "radical" is accusing those who disagree with you as "aiding" terrorists?
Do you always read off of Bill O'Reilly's teleprompter or quote from Ann Coulter’s books?
The opinions I’m forming about Iraq are not from having been there, and unless you’re writing this from a slum in downtown Basra, I’m going to guess you’re not there either. So drawing a comparison between my opinions and that of a four star general is a bit out of context because you're suggesting I'm forming these thoughts on my own, without reading or researching the experts.
However, since you are keen on the opinions of retired generals, allow me to paste some quotes from them:
- "Rumsfeld should step aside and let someone step in who can be more realistic. They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda. I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign.”
- "I believe we need a fresh start at the Pentagon... We need leadership up there that respects the military as they expect the military to respect them. We need a leader who understands teamwork, a leader who knows to build teams, a leader that does it without intimidation. I have nothing to gain in doing this. There is no political agenda at all. For 31 years I was a loyal subordinate and did not tolerate dissension in the ranks. My sole motivation, pure and simple, are the service men and women and their incredible families."
- "After 9/11, I was a witness and therefore a party to the actions that led us to the invasion of Iraq--an unnecessary war. Inside the military family, I made no secret of my view that the zealots' rationale for war made no sense. And I think I was outspoken enough to make those senior to me uncomfortable. But I now regret that I did not more openly challenge those who were determined to invade a country whose actions were peripheral to the real threat--al-Qaeda. I retired from the military four months before the invasion, in part because of my opposition to those who had used 9/11's tragedy to hijack our security policy. Until now, I have resisted speaking out in public. I've been silent long enough."
- "In the five years Mr. Rumsfeld has presided over the Pentagon, I have seen a climate of groupthink become dominant and a growing reluctance by experienced military men and civilians to challenge the notions of the senior leadership.
It is all too clear that General Shinseki was right: several hundred thousand men would have made a big difference then, as we began Phase IV, or country reconstruction. There was never a question that we would make quick work of the Iraqi Army. "
Now – you tell me – do these decorated retired generals want us to lose in Iraq so Democrats get into office? Please answer that question.
And finally, if I'm radically to the left because I, as most Americans now do, see this war as a mistake, then stamp me radical my friend. If I'm radical because I have serious issues with the religious right and their control of the Republican party, and I believe in secular, progressive government, then please - let it be known I'm about as radical as it gets.
If I'm radical because I'm against voting machines, I'm pro-election and campaign finance reform, I'm anti-torture, anti-tax cut in a time of war, pro-Veteran care, against radical forms of any organized religion, pro-environment, pro-choice, etc...well then I appreciate your positive feedback.
http://www.charlescrain.com/
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
these folks are in iraq- and they don't paint a glowing picture of things there either.
Well Betmo, according to anonymous, Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Ann Coulter, etc they obviously hate America.
Jeremy,
How can you say all this and not mention the new paint on the walls that have not been blown up? Under Saddam you can bet your sweet bippy that no one ever got new paint. Is this not a sign of progress? Snark.
Wow!! How neat. A civil war isn't a civil war just because it's confined to one city!!
Whatever.
A civil war is people of a country killing each other. It doesn't matter if it is confined to one city. It's still a civil war.
How come I get a pass for my racist comments from the media ? Imagine if I were a Conservative, this blog would be flaming me like I was a giant doobie. No double standards though right ?
Which media gave him the free pass, the Russian media? I’ve read and heard about that all over the place. I thought it was pretty distasteful, and haven’t heard the right-wing anti-politically correct crowd give him a pass as they would if someone else had said it.
His comment was stupid, and I disagree with the Indian who was on the receiving end of the comment (read here .
This site doesn’t document every offensive thing every Republican says either. Rush Limbaugh makes comments that are borderline and over-the-border racist almost weekly, but I don’t document all of those incidents either – otherwise this site would be called StupidShitRushLimbaughSays.com.
I guess I would say that many right wingers utter offensive, racist, homophobic statements on a consistent basis and sometimes legislate to back up these statements, and that catches my eye often.
If you’d like to write a “guest spot” on the incident, as long as it is sincere, I’ll publish it on the site. How does that sound?
Post a Comment
<< Home